Peer Review Process

BOGANI: Journal of Community Service applies a Double-Blind Peer Review system, in which the identities of authors and reviewers are kept confidential to ensure objectivity and quality in the review process.

Review process stages:

1. Initial Screening (1–2 weeks)

At this stage, the editor performs an initial check including:

• Suitability with the journal focus and scope

• Compliance with the journal template and format

• Plagiarism screening using plagiarism detection software

• Completeness of manuscript components

2. Review by Minimum 2 Reviewers (3–6 weeks)

Manuscripts that pass the initial screening will be sent to at least two reviewers with relevant expertise and will be evaluated based on:

• Scientific contribution and community impact

• Novelty of the community service program or model

• Clarity of implementation method

• Results and impact of the activity

• Depth of analysis and discussion

• Relevance to community service field

3. Editorial Decision

Based on the reviewer reports, the editor will decide:

• Accept

• Minor Revision

• Major Revision

• Reject

Authors must revise the manuscript according to reviewer comments within the given time.

4. Final Decision

The final decision is made by the Editor-in-Chief based on reviewer recommendations and editorial consideration.

The estimated total review time is 4–6 weeks, depending on reviewer response time and author revisions.